A CHESHIRE man who engaged in online sex chats with what he thought were four underage girls was actually communicating with decoys set up by paedophile hunters.
Andrew Gates, 50, of Alan Street, Northwich, pleaded guilty to a total of seven charges, including five offences of attempting to engage in sexual communication with a child.
He also admitted one offence of causing what he believed was a 14-year-old girl to engage in sexual activity, and one offence of intentionally inciting what he believed was a 13-year-old girl to engage in sexual activity.
Appearing at Chester Crown Court on Thursday, June 16, Gates was jailed for 30 months.
None of the four victims in the case were, as Gates had believed, really 13 or 14-year-old girls. They were paedophile hunters who posed as decoys on the messaging service Nearby, an app which has since been deactivated following a data breach.
Prosecuting, Claire Jones said all the offences took place between January and February 2021.
The first decoy was 'Gemma, 13'. Gates engaged in sexual chats with the first decoy and sent that account a photo of himself looking at the camera. 'Gemma' responded by sending a photo, to which Gates responded "wow wow wow" and said she "looked really cute".
Gates later sent a topless photo of himself and asked if they could be boyfriend and girlfriend, asking for naked pictures of her, and calling her his "princess".
He said he "wanted to keep her warm" and said "age is just a number" in reference to having a relationship between the two, but added to keep said relationship "secret".
During one conversation, he messaged with detailed instructions on how the 13-year-old girl could perform a sex act as stress relief. He also sent her a photo of his penis.
The second decoy posed as 14-year-old girl 'Jessica' on the same social media platform. Gates said she was "scrummy" and "sorry he could not wash her back while she was in the bath".
Gates asked the girl to send photos, adding they would "stay private".
The third decoy posed as a 14-year-old girl, 'Steph' and Gates asked for a photo of her, also asking if she wanted her back washing in the bath. The conversation later turned to Whatsapp messages.
Decoy number four was also named Gemma, a 14-year-old girl. Gates provided his phone number for the conversation to go to Whatsapp and Gates asked her for a photo. 'Gemma' replied her camera was not working, and Gates offered to send her a phone. He said he "would like to keep her warm and cuddle her".
The group of paedophile hunters, Ms Jones told the court, then organised a sting and contacted police, who arrested Gates at his address. Upon his arrest, Gates said: "I can't believe it, I have let myself down."
He had no previous convictions.
Defending, Brian Treadwell said Gates had admitted the charges and been honest with probation about a sexual attraction to underage children.
No children had been directly impacted by his offending as all the 'victims' were decoys, and he had made no attempt to conceal his identification.
Gates was "extraordinarily socially isolated", the court heard. He had been in a relationship with a woman, that ended, and he married that woman's mother, who later died from an illness.
The pre-sentence report showed Gates had said: "I am disgusted with myself, I am ashamed, I have brought shame upon my family."
He had depression and anxiety, and was not deemed a high risk of serious harm by probation.
Judge Simon Berkson, sentencing, said the most aggravating feature about the case was that there were four potential victims.
He added: "You have faced up to your criminal behaviour, and I am sentencing a man of good character.
"However, only an immediate custodial sentence can achieve appropriate punishment."
As well as the 30-month prison term, Gates was made the subject of a 15-year Sexual Harm Prevention Order severely restricting his future internet usage and banning him from communicating with underage children without permission from a parent or guardian.
The mobile phone used for the messaging on the app was made the subject of a deprivation order.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article